Quantum weak values are not unique; what do they actually measure?

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Version 3 is mathematically identical to Version 2, but incorporates a referee's suggestions. A potentially ambiguous passage

Scientific paper

Precise definitions of "weak [quantum] measurements" and "weak value" [of a quantum observable] are offered, which seem to capture the meaning of the often vague ways that these terms are used in the literature. Simple finite dimensional examples are given showing that weak values of an observable are not unique, and in fact arbitrary weak values can be obtained by appropriate weak measurements. This implies that a "weak value" of an observable A, *by itself*, can furnish no unambiguous information about A; any information in a weak value is inextricably connected with the particular measurement procedure used to obtain that weak value. Moreover, arbitrary weak values can be obtained using a "meter space" of dimension as small as 2. A "Remarks" section questions the utility of "weak measurement".

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Quantum weak values are not unique; what do they actually measure? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Quantum weak values are not unique; what do they actually measure?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quantum weak values are not unique; what do they actually measure? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-11630

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.