Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
1996-06-25
Physics
Quantum Physics
Revision here adds two items : 1. an introduction attempting to illuminate debate by Penrose and Hawking on Schrodinger's cat
Scientific paper
A density operator, $\rho = {P}_{\alpha } |\alpha > <\alpha | + {P}_{\beta } |\beta > <\beta |$, with ${P}_{\alpha }$ and ${P}_{\beta }$ linearly independent normalized wave functions, must be traced normalized, so ${P}_{\beta } = 1 - {P}_{\alpha }$. However, unless $<\alpha |\beta > = 0$, ${P}_{\alpha }$ and ${P}_{\beta }$ cannot be interpreted as probabilities of finding $|\alpha >$ and $|\beta >$ respectively. We show that a density matrix comprised of two (${P}_{\alpha }$ and ${P}_{\beta }$ nonzero) non-orthogonal projectors have unique spectral decomposition into diagonal form with orthogonal projectors. Only then, according to axioms of Von Neumann and Fock, can we have probability interpretation of that density matrix, only then can the diagonal elements be interpreted as probabilities of an ensemble. Those probabilities on the diagonal are not ${P}_{\alpha }$ and ${P}_{\beta}$. Further, only in the case of orthogonal projectors can we have the degenerate situation in which multiple ensembles are permitted.
No associations
LandOfFree
Correct interpretation of trace normalized density matrices as ensembles does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Correct interpretation of trace normalized density matrices as ensembles, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Correct interpretation of trace normalized density matrices as ensembles will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-115541