Ring current intensification and convection-driven negative bays: Multisatellite studies

Details Ring current intensification and convection-driven negative bays: Multisatellite studies Ring current intensification and convection-driven negative bays: Multisatellite studies

Nov 2003

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2003jgra..108.1407z&link_type=abstract

Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 108, Issue A11, pp. SMP 13-1, CiteID 1407, DOI 10.1029/2003JA009881

Physics

2

Magnetospheric Physics: Storms And Substorms, Magnetospheric Physics: Ring Current, Magnetospheric Physics: Solar Wind/Magnetosphere Interactions, Magnetospheric Physics: Energetic Particles, Precipitating, Magnetospheric Physics: Auroral Phenomena (2407)

Scientific paper

The original view on the cause of ring current intensifications was a frequent occurrence of intense substorm expansion phases. Results from many studies have supported this view. However, whether this is the only mechanism of ring current buildup has been a controversy. Kamide [1992] asserted that ring current intensification is due to ``sustained, southward IMF, not because of frequent occurrence of intense substorms.'' Lui et al. [2001] have shown that the ring current can be intensified during enhanced convection without substorm occurrence. Tsurutani et al. [2003] have found that there was a lack of substorm expansion phases for long periods of time (up to 7 hours) in 5 out of 11 storm main phases (in 1997) that were induced by the smoothly varying Bz component of the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) within interplanetary magnetic clouds. In this paper, a relatively weak magnetic storm event (with minimum SYM-H at -47 nT) that occurred on 15 July 1997 is studied using ground-based magnetograms, polar cap potentials from Super Dual Auroral Radar Network, and Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) geosynchronous energetic particle data as well as the Polar UV imaging (for aurorae) and Wind (for the solar wind) data. It is shown that during the storm main phase, there was a lack of substorm expansion phase activity (from imaging and the ground-based data) and a lack of energetic particle injections at the geostationary orbit. The most prominent auroral forms were north-south aligned auroral patches and torches. Dawn and dusk aurorae were more intense than the aurorae near midnight, where auroral gaps occurred. In addition, this paper shows that there was a significant directly driven activity during the storm main phase when the IMF was continually southward. We argue that during this event the ring current intensification was more strongly associated with enhanced magnetospheric convection than with impulsive energy unloading. Three scenarios are suggested to explain the relatively low intensity of the magnetic storm induced by a magnetic cloud. They are (1) weak nightside auroral zone ionospheric ion outflows (due to lack of substorms), (2) choked penetration of the tail plasma flow (due to lack of substorms), and (3) retarded magnetospheric convection (due to reduced solar wind-magnetosphere reconnection). The observed saturation of the polar cap potential drop is in support of this latter mechanism.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Ring current intensification and convection-driven negative bays: Multisatellite studies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Ring current intensification and convection-driven negative bays: Multisatellite studies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Ring current intensification and convection-driven negative bays: Multisatellite studies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1091175