Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison

Details Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison

2010-12-10

arxiv.org/abs/1012.2179v1

Physics

Nuclear Physics

Nuclear Theory

17 pages including 5 figures , IJMPE (accepted)

Scientific paper

We compare the systematics of binding energies computed within the standard and extended versions of the relativistic mean-field (RMF) model and the Skyrme Hartree-Fock (SHF) model. The general trends for the binding energies for super-heavy nuclei are significantly different for these models. The SHF models tend to underbind the superheavy nuclei, while, RMF models show just the opposite trend. The extended RMF model seems to provide remarkable improvements over the results obtained for the standard RMF model.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Energy systematics of heavy nuclei -- mean field models in comparison will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-106679