Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002jgra..107.1229k&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics), Volume 107, Issue A9, pp. SMP 5-1, CiteID 1229, DOI 10.1029/2001JA000147
Physics
3
Magnetospheric Physics: Magnetospheric Configuration And Dynamics, Magnetospheric Physics: Magnetosphere-Inner, Magnetospheric Physics: Numerical Modeling, Magnetospheric Physics: Plasma Convection, Magnetospheric Physics: Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
In a previous study we performed a statistical analysis of the geosynchronous plasma environment from measurements of the magnetospheric plasma analyzer instruments aboard the Los Alamos geosynchronous spacecraft. In that study the mean spin-averaged particle fluxes were determined as a function of local time and Kp index, averaged over an entire year of observations. Particles on open drift trajectories should cross geosynchronous orbit twice during their drift from the nightside plasma sheet, through the inner magnetosphere, and out to the dayside magnetopause. The ratio of incoming plasma sheet phase space density and outgoing dayside phase space density of every drift path thus contains information about particle losses during the drift through the near-Earth region. For ions the losses are largely caused by charge exchange reactions with hydrogen atoms. Applying tomographic inversion techniques, we use the observed statistical losses inside the geosynchronous orbit region to infer the spatial distribution of exospheric neutral hydrogen. The particle drift paths from the nightside of geosynchronous orbit to the dayside are calculated from electric and magnetic field models. To test the sensitivity of the tomography to the convection model, we invert the geosynchronous particle observations using various field model combinations and compare the results. We find that the neutral hydrogen densities obtained from the inversion disagree with existing models of the exosphere, mainly in the near-Earth region. These differences are due to lower-than-expected losses of lower-energy particles that nominally drift through the inner region and/or particle sources not considered in the study.
Glassmeier Karl-Heintz
Korth Haje
Phillips Scott W.
Thomsen Michelle F.
No associations
LandOfFree
Particle tomography of the inner magnetosphere does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Particle tomography of the inner magnetosphere, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Particle tomography of the inner magnetosphere will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1051915