Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2010-10-15
Physics
Quantum Physics
6 pages,8 figures
Scientific paper
Given two quantum memories for continuous variables (e.g., the collective pseudo-spin of two atomic ensembles) and the possibility to perform passive optical operations (typically beam-splitters) on the optical modes before or after the storage, two possible scenarios arise resulting in generally different degrees of final entanglement. Namely, one could either store an entangled state and retrieve it directly from the memory, or rather store two separate single-mode squeezed states and then combine them with a beam-splitter to generate the final entangled state. In this paper, we address the question of which of these two options yields the higher entanglement. By adopting a well established descrip- tion of QND feedback memories, and a simple but realistic noise model, we analytically determine the optimal choice for several regions of noise parameters and quantify the advantage it entails, not only in terms of final entanglement but also in terms of the capability of the final state to act as a shared resource for quantum teleportation. We will see that, for 'ideal' or 'nearly ideal' memories, the more efficient of the two options is the one that better protects the quadrature subject to the largest noise in the memory (by increasing it and making it more robust).
Serafini Alessio
Yadsan-Appleby Hulya
No associations
LandOfFree
Would one rather store squeezing or entanglement in continuous variable quantum memories? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Would one rather store squeezing or entanglement in continuous variable quantum memories?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Would one rather store squeezing or entanglement in continuous variable quantum memories? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-204120