Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2006-01-27
Physical Theory and its Interpretation, W. Demopoulos and I. Pitowsky (eds.) Springer 2006
Physics
Quantum Physics
16 pages, LaTeX. Forthcoming in ``Physical Theory and Its Interpretation: Essays in Honor of Jeffrey Bub'' Demopoulos and Pito
Scientific paper
In a comparison of the principles of special relativity and of quantum mechanics, the former theory is marked by its relative economy and apparent explanatory simplicity. A number of theorists have thus been led to search for a small number of postulates - essentially information theoretic in nature - that would play the role in quantum mechanics that the relativity principle and the light postulate jointly play in Einstein's 1905 special relativity theory. The purpose of the present paper is to resist this idea, at least in so far as it is supposed to reveal the fundamental form of the theory. It is argued that the methodology of Einstein's 1905 theory represents a victory of pragmatism over explanatory depth; and that its adoption only made sense in the context of the chaotic state state of physics at the start of the 20th century - as Einstein well knew.
Brown Harvey R.
Timpson Christopher G.
No associations
LandOfFree
Why special relativity should not be a template for a fundamental reformulation of quantum mechanics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Why special relativity should not be a template for a fundamental reformulation of quantum mechanics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why special relativity should not be a template for a fundamental reformulation of quantum mechanics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-506268