Which Constituent Quark Model Is Better?

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6pp., 3 figs., Asia-Pacific Few-Body Conf. II (Shanghai, Aug.25-30 2002), to appear in MPLA; references added

Scientific paper

10.1142/S021773230301048X

A comparative study has been done by calculating the effective baryon-baryon interactions of the 64 lowest channels consisting of octet and decuplet baryons with three constituent quark models: the extended quark gluon exchange model, the Goldstone boson exchange model and the quark gluon meson exchange hybrid model. We find that these three models give similar results for 44 channels. Further tests of these models are discussed.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Which Constituent Quark Model Is Better? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Which Constituent Quark Model Is Better?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Which Constituent Quark Model Is Better? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-602730

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.