When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective

Details When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective

2012-02-17

arxiv.org/abs/1202.3823v1

Medical Phys, 38: 1635-1640, 2011

Physics

Medical Physics

Scientific paper

Purpose: To identify the most informative methods for reporting results of treatment planning comparisons. Methods: Seven papers from the past year of International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics reported on comparisons of treatment plans for IMRT and IMAT. The papers were reviewed to identify methods of comparisons. Decision theoretical concepts were used to evaluate the study methods and highlight those that provide the most information. Results: None of the studies examined the correlation between objectives. Statistical comparisons provided some information but not enough to make provide support for a robust decision analysis. Conclusion: The increased use of treatment planning studies to evaluate different methods in radiation therapy requires improved standards for designing the studies and reporting the results.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and When is Better Best? A multiobjective perspective will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-35240