Physics
Scientific paper
May 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995georl..22.1089p&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 22, Issue 9, p. 1089-1092
Physics
13
Atmospheric Composition And Structure: Troposphere-Constituent Transport And Chemistry, Meteorology And Atmospheric Dynamics: Convective Processes, Meteorology And Atmospheric Dynamics: Numerical Modeling And Data Assimilation, Atmospheric Composition And Structure: Pollution-Urban And Regional
Scientific paper
We have performed a preliminary comparison of the GEOS-1 (Goddard Earth Observing System) data assimilation system convective cloud mass fluxes with fluxes from a cloud-resolving model (the Goddard Cumulus Ensemble Model, GCE). A squall line case study (10-11 June 1985 Oklahoma PRESTORM episode) is the basis of the comparison. Regional (central U. S.) monthly total convective mass flux for June 1985 from GEOS-1 compares favorably with estimates from a statistical/dynamical approach using GCE simulations and satellite-derived cloud observations. The GEOS-1 convective mass fluxes produce reasonable estimates of monthly-averaged regional convective venting of CO from the boundary layer at least in an urban-influenced continental region, suggesting that they can be used in tracer transport simulations.
McNamara Donna P.
Molod Andrea M.
Pickering Kenneth E.
Rood Richard B.
Tao Wei-Kuo
No associations
LandOfFree
Vertical transport by convective clouds: Comparisons of three modeling approaches does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Vertical transport by convective clouds: Comparisons of three modeling approaches, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Vertical transport by convective clouds: Comparisons of three modeling approaches will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1060604