Physics – Plasma Physics
Scientific paper
2008-01-17
Physics
Plasma Physics
27 pages, 1 table, 6 figures
Scientific paper
10.1063/1.2928909
Because experiment/model comparisons in magnetic confinement fusion have not yet satisfied the requirements for validation as understood broadly, a set of approaches to validating mathematical models and numerical algorithms are recommended as good practices. Previously identified procedures, such as verification, qualification, and analysis of error and uncertainty, remain important. However, particular challenges intrinsic to fusion plasmas and physical measurement therein lead to identification of new or less familiar concepts that are also critical in validation. These include the primacy hierarchy, which tracks the integration of measurable quantities, and sensitivity analysis, which assesses how model output is apportioned to different sources of variation. The use of validation metrics for individual measurements is extended to multiple measurements, with provisions for the primacy hierarchy and sensitivity. This composite validation metric is essential for quantitatively evaluating comparisons with experiments. To mount successful and credible validation in magnetic fusion, a new culture of validation is envisaged.
Greenwald M.
Leboeuf Jean-Noel
McKee George R.
Mikkelsen David R.
Nevins William M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Validation in Fusion Research: Towards Guidelines and Best Practices does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Validation in Fusion Research: Towards Guidelines and Best Practices, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Validation in Fusion Research: Towards Guidelines and Best Practices will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-690257