Validating relativistic models of nuclear structure against theoretical, experimental, and observational constraints

Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

14 pages (5 figures and 2 tables included)

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevC.76.064310

Relativistic mean-field models of nuclear structure have been enormously successful at reproducing ground-state properties of finite nuclei throughout the periodic table using a handful of accurately calibrated parameters. In this contribution we use powerful theoretical, experimental, and observational constraints -- not employed in the calibration procedure -- to validate two such models: NL3 and FSUGold. It is observed that FSUGold is consistent with all these constraints, except perhaps for a high density equation of state that appears mildly softer than required by astronomical observations. It is argued that incorporating such constrains goes a long way in removing much of the ambiguity left over from the standard calibrating procedure.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Validating relativistic models of nuclear structure against theoretical, experimental, and observational constraints does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Validating relativistic models of nuclear structure against theoretical, experimental, and observational constraints, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Validating relativistic models of nuclear structure against theoretical, experimental, and observational constraints will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-379259

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.