Physics
Scientific paper
Jan 1994
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1994jgr....99..383g&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 99, no. A1, p. 383-388
Physics
40
Auroral Ionization, Emission Spectra, Energy Spectra, Far Ultraviolet Radiation, Dayglow, Lyman Spectra, Neutral Atmospheres, Spectrum Analysis
Scientific paper
In an earlier study we modeled selected Far Ultraviolet (FUV) auroral emissions (O I(1356 A), N2 Lyman-Birge-Hopfield (LBH) (1464 A), and LBH (1838 A)) to examine the sensitivity of these emissions and their ratios to likely changes in the neutral atmosphere. In this paper we extend that study to examine the dependence of these same emissions and their ratios on the shape of the energy distribution of the auroral electrons. In particular, we wish to determine whether changes in energy spectra might interfere with our determination of the characteristic energy. Modeled column-integrated emissions show relatively small (less than 30%) dependences on the shape and width of the incident energy spectrum, provided the average energy and total energy flux of the energy distribution are held constant. Long-wavelength FUV emissions, which are relatively unaffected by O2 absorption losses, exhibit virtually no dependence on the shape of the incident energy distribution. Changes in ratios of FUV short- to long-wavelength emissions as a function of characteristic energy are much larger than those due to changes in energy distribution. As a result, the determination of characteristic energy using these emission ratios is relatively unambiguous. We also examine the relative intensities of the aurora and the dayglow for various conditions. The intensities of modeled FUV auroral emissions relative to the dayglow emissions are presented as a function of solar zenith angle and incident energy flux. Under certain conditions (energy flux less than or equal 1 erg/sq cm/s and solar zenith angle less than or equal 50 deg) the dayglow will be limiting factor in the detection of weak auroras.
Germany Glynn A.
Richards Paul G.
Torr Douglas G.
Torr Marsha R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Use of FUV auroral emissions as diagnostic indicators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Use of FUV auroral emissions as diagnostic indicators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Use of FUV auroral emissions as diagnostic indicators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-870095