Two-dimensional self-avoiding walks and polymer adsorption: Critical fugacity estimates

Physics – Mathematical Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

12 pages, 3 figures, 7 tables

Scientific paper

Recently Beaton, de Gier and Guttmann proved a conjecture of Batchelor and Yung that the critical fugacity of self-avoiding walks interacting with (alternate) sites on the surface of the honeycomb lattice is $1+\sqrt{2}$. A key identity used in that proof depends on the existence of a parafermionic observable for self-avoiding walks interacting with a surface on the honeycomb lattice. Despite the absence of a corresponding observable for SAW on the square and triangular lattices, we show that in the limit of large lattices, some of the consequences observed for the honeycomb lattice persist irrespective of lattice. This permits the accurate estimation of the critical fugacity for the corresponding problem for the square and triangular lattices. We consider both edge and site weighting, and results of unprecedented precision are achieved. We also \emph{prove} the corresponding result fo the edge-weighted case for the honeycomb lattice.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Two-dimensional self-avoiding walks and polymer adsorption: Critical fugacity estimates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Two-dimensional self-avoiding walks and polymer adsorption: Critical fugacity estimates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Two-dimensional self-avoiding walks and polymer adsorption: Critical fugacity estimates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-147155

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.