Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Sep 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992lmip.conf...28g&link_type=abstract
In Lunar and Planetary Inst., International Conference on Large Meteorite Impacts and Planetary Evolution p 28-29 (SEE N93-10112
Physics
Geophysics
Ejecta, Erosion, Geomorphology, Geophysics, Hypotheses, Landforms, Meteorite Craters, Topography, Comets, Drilling, Geochronology, Lunar Craters, U.S.S.R.
Scientific paper
The record of 10-km-scale impact events of Quaternary age includes only two 'proven' impact structures: the Zhamanshin Impact Feature (ZIF) and the Bosumtwi Impact Crater (BIC). What makes these impact landforms interesting from the standpoint of recent Earth history is their almost total lack of morphologic similarity, in spite of similar absolute ages and dimensions. The BIC resembles pristine complex craters on the Moon to first order (i.e., 'U'-shaped topographic cross section with preserved rim), while the ZIF displays virtually none of the typical morphologic elements of a 13- to 14-km-diameter complex crater. Indeed, this apparent lack of a craterlike surficial topographic expression initially led Soviet geologists to conclude that the structure was only 5.5 to 6 km in diameter and at least 4.5 Ma in age. However, more recent drilling and geophysical observations at the ZIF have indicated that its pre-erosional diameter is at least 13.5 km, and that its age is most probably 0.87 Ma. Why the present topographic expression of a 13.5-km complex impact crater less than 1 m.y. old most closely resembles heavily degraded Mesozoic shield craters such as Lappajarvi is a question of considerable debate. Hypotheses for the lack of a clearly defined craterlike form at the ZIF include a highly oblique impact, a low-strength 'cometary' projectile, weak or water-saturated target materials, and anomalous erosion patterns. The problem remains unresolved because typical erosion rates within the arid sedimentary platform environment of central Kazakhstan in which the ZIF is located are typically low; it would require at least a factor of 10 greater erosion at the ZIF in order to degrade the near-rim ejecta typical of a 13.5-km complex crater by hundreds of meters in only 0.87 Ma, and to partially infill an inner cavity with 27 cu km (an equivalent uniform thickness of infill of 166 m). Our analysis of the degree of erosion and infill at the ZIF calls for rates in the 0.19 to 0.38 mm/yr range over the lifetime of the landform, which are a factor of 10 to 20 in excess of typical rates for the Kazakhstan semidesert.
Garvin James B.
Schnetzler Charles C.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Zhamanshin impact feature: A new class of complex crater? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Zhamanshin impact feature: A new class of complex crater?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Zhamanshin impact feature: A new class of complex crater? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1769365