The shadow interpretation versus quantum paradoxes

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

This paper explores the consequences of denying the "emptiness of paths not taken," EPNT, premise of Bernstein, Greenberger, Horne, and Zeilinger (BGHZ) in their paper titled, Bell theorem without inequalities.[ ] Carrying out the negation of EPNT leads to the concept of a "shadow stream." Streams are essentially particle implementations of the paths in Feynman path-integrals, resulting in a simple and consistent extension of the standard axioms for quantum mechanics. The construct provides elegant resolutions of single- and multi-particle interference paradoxes. Moreover, combining the argument of this paper with that of BGHZ shows that there are just two choices for quantum foundations: interpretations closely similar to the present one or those that harbor instantaneous action at a distance.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The shadow interpretation versus quantum paradoxes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The shadow interpretation versus quantum paradoxes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The shadow interpretation versus quantum paradoxes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-671523

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.