Physics – Nuclear Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 2001
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2001aipc..561..377r&link_type=abstract
TOURS SYMPOSIUM ON NUCLEAR PHYSICS IV: TOURS 2000. AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 561, pp. 377-387 (2001).
Physics
Nuclear Physics
1
220<=A, Hartree-Fock And Random-Phase Approximations, Properties Of Nuclei, Nuclear Energy Levels
Scientific paper
We concentrate on the two most widely used mean-field models, Skyrme-Hartree-Fock and relativistic mean field. We discuss their performance in view of the extended range of experimental information in terms of a guided tour through selected examples of success, failures and subsequent improvement of the models drawn from comparison with key observables as isotopic shifts, trends of binding energies or single-particle spectra. Particular attention is paid to the extrapolative power with respect to superheavy elements (SHE). It turns out that the most important aspect is here the actual level sequence as implied by the given mean-field models. We will compare the performance of available parametrisations and discuss briefly possible improvements. .
Bender Martin
Bürvenich T.
Cornelius T.
Fleischer P.
Maruhn Joachim A.
No associations
LandOfFree
The performance of mean-field models for superheavy elements does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The performance of mean-field models for superheavy elements, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The performance of mean-field models for superheavy elements will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1183518