Physics
Scientific paper
Mar 1911
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1911natur..86....9l&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 86, Issue 2157, pp. 9-12 (1911).
Physics
Scientific paper
Fact. IT will be necessary, first, to my regret, to direct attention to some further errors in Dr. Krogness's communication in NATURE, December 8, 1910, p. 170, to which I made reply in the issue of January 5, p. 306. He questioned the correctness of our time of beginning of the disturbance, May 8, 1902, as recorded on the horizontal intensity curve at Potsdam, viz. 12h. om. Greenwich mean civil time, whereas his determination for the same station was 11h. 58m. In my reply, I stated (idem, p. 307) that Dr. Krogness must have made an error somewhere, for, upon repetition of our time scalings, based upon the data supplied us by the Potsdam Observatory, we got our identical result. I next wrote to the Potsdam Magnetic Observatory and requested that the time be scaled with all possible accuracy from the original magnetogram. Under date Potsdam, January 20, 1911, Dr. Venske gives the time in question as 11h. 59.7m., hence within 0.3m. of our time, but differing 1.7m. from that of Dr. Krogness.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Non-simultaneity and the generally Eastward Progression of Sudden Magnetic Storms does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Non-simultaneity and the generally Eastward Progression of Sudden Magnetic Storms, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Non-simultaneity and the generally Eastward Progression of Sudden Magnetic Storms will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-858021