Physics
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010agufm.p43a..08s&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #P43A-08
Physics
[5400] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets, [6250] Planetary Sciences: Solar System Objects / Moon, [8118] Tectonophysics / Dynamics And Mechanics Of Faulting, [8136] Tectonophysics / Impact Phenomena
Scientific paper
Impact basins are the largest geologic structures on planetary surfaces. Single or multiple ring-shaped scarps or arcuate chains of massifs typically surround basin-sized craters (e.g., larger than about 300 km diameter on the moon [1]). Impact basins also possess central mass anomalies related to ejection of a portion of the crust (and mantle) and uplift of the mantle. I will discuss insights into the mechanics of impact basin formation derived from numerical simulations and focus on features that may be compared with gravity and topography data. The simulations of basin formation use the method of [2] with an improved rheological model that includes dynamic weakening of faults and more accurate treatment of the mantle solidus. Two-dimensional simulations of vertical impacts onto spherical planets utilize a central gravity field, and three-dimensional simulations of oblique impacts include a self-gravity calculation. During the opening and collapse of the transient crater, localization of strain leads to deformation features that are interpreted as deep faults through the lithosphere. Based on simulations of mantle-excavating impacts onto the moon and Mars with thermal gradients that intersect the solidus in the asthenosphere, the final impact structure has three major features: (i) an inner basin filled with melt and bounded by the folded lithosphere, (ii) a broad shallow terrace of faulted and translated lithosphere with an ejecta deposit, and (iii) the surrounding autochthonous lithosphere with radially thinning ejecta. The folded lithosphere is a complex structure that experiences translation inward and then outward again during collapse of the transient cavity. The uplifted mantle within this structure is overlain by a thin layer of hot crustal material. In addition to asymmetry in the excavated material, 45-degree impact events produce an asymmetric terrace feature. The principal observations for comparison to the calculations are the inferred locations of major ring structures (derived from topography and geologic mapping) and the crustal thickness and mantle topography (derived from gravity and topography) [see also 3]. Preliminary comparisons indicate that the simulations produce the major features in the observations. I will present detailed comparisons between simulations and observations for major basins on the moon, including South Pole-Aitken, for different initial lithospheric thicknesses and thermal gradients. [1] Spudis, P.D. (1993) The Geology of Multi-Ring Impact basins: Cambridge University Press. [2] Senft, L.E. and S.T. Stewart (2009) Earth and Planetary Science Letters 287, 471-482. [3] Lillis, R.J., et al. (2010) AGU Fall Meeting.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Mechanics of Impact Basin Formation: Comparisons between Modeling and Geophysical Observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Mechanics of Impact Basin Formation: Comparisons between Modeling and Geophysical Observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Mechanics of Impact Basin Formation: Comparisons between Modeling and Geophysical Observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1497274