Physics – Physics and Society
Scientific paper
2009-08-21
Physics
Physics and Society
7 pages, 2 tables
Scientific paper
Since the publication of Robert K. Merton's theory of cumulative advantage in science (Matthew Effect), several empirical studies have tried to measure its presence at the level of papers, individual researchers, institutions or countries. However, these studies seldom control for the intrinsic "quality" of papers or of researchers--"better" (however defined) papers or researchers could receive higher citation rates because they are indeed of better quality. Using an original method for controlling the intrinsic value of papers--identical duplicate papers published in different journals with different impact factors--this paper shows that the journal in which papers are published have a strong influence on their citation rates, as duplicate papers published in high impact journals obtain, on average, twice as much citations as their identical counterparts published in journals with lower impact factors. The intrinsic value of a paper is thus not the only reason a given paper gets cited or not; there is a specific Matthew effect attached to journals and this gives to paper published there an added value over and above their intrinsic quality.
Gingras Yves
Larivière Vincent
No associations
LandOfFree
The impact factor's Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The impact factor's Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The impact factor's Matthew effect: a natural experiment in bibliometrics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-667130