Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
2010-02-19
Physics
Quantum Physics
45 pages, Latex, 3 Figures; forthcoming in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Scientific paper
This paper develops an analogy proposed by Stachel between general relativity (GR) and quantum mechanics (QM) as regards permutation invariance. Our main idea is to overcome Pooley's criticism of the analogy by appeal to paraparticles. In GR the equations are (the solution space is) invariant under diffeomorphisms permuting spacetime points. Similarly, in QM the equations are invariant under particle permutations. Stachel argued that this feature--a theory's `not caring which point, or particle, is which'--supported a structuralist ontology. Pooley criticizes this analogy: in QM the (anti-)symmetrization of fermions and bosons implies that each individual state (solution) is fixed by each permutation, while in GR a diffeomorphism yields in general a distinct, albeit isomorphic, solution. We define various versions of structuralism, and go on to formulate Stachel's and Pooley's positions, admittedly in our own terms. We then reply to Pooley. Though he is right about fermions and bosons, QM equally allows more general types of symmetry, in which states (vectors, rays or density operators) are not fixed by all permutations (called `paraparticle states'). Thus Stachel's analogy is revived.
Butterfield Jeremy
Caulton Adam
No associations
LandOfFree
Symmetries and Paraparticles as a Motivation for Structuralism does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Symmetries and Paraparticles as a Motivation for Structuralism, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Symmetries and Paraparticles as a Motivation for Structuralism will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-363679