Physics – Quantum Physics
Scientific paper
1994-12-23
The Foundational Debate. Complexity and Constructivity in Mathematics and Physics. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, Vol. 3, e
Physics
Quantum Physics
13 pages, LaTeX
Scientific paper
Are minds subject to laws of physics? Are the laws of physics computable? Are conscious thought processes computable? Currently there is little agreement as to what are the right answers to these questions. Penrose goes one step further and asserts that: {\it a radical new theory is indeed needed, and I am suggesting, moreover, that this theory, when it is found, will be of an essentially non-computational character.} The aim of this paper is three fold: 1) to examine the incompatibility between the hypothesis of strong determinism and computability, 2) to give new examples of uncomputable physical laws, and 3) to discuss the relevance of G\"odel's Incompleteness Theorem in refuting the claim that an algorithmic theory---like strong AI---can provide an adequate theory of mind. Finally, we question the adequacy of the theory of computation to discuss physical laws and thought processes.
Calude Cristian
Campbell Iain D.
Ştefănecu D.
Svozil Karl
No associations
LandOfFree
Strong Determinism vs. Computability does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Strong Determinism vs. Computability, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Strong Determinism vs. Computability will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-377180