Physics – Optics
Scientific paper
Feb 1983
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1983apopt..22..520m&link_type=abstract
Applied Optics, vol. 22, Feb. 15, 1983, p. 520, 521.
Physics
Optics
5
Cassegrain Optics, Mirrors, Optical Correction Procedure, Performance Tests, Reflecting Telescopes, Aberration, Cost Effectiveness, Hyperbolic Functions, Surface Geometry
Scientific paper
Astronomers have usually employed a Hindle sphere to test the secondaries of Cassegrain and Ritchey-Chretien telescopes. For very large telescopes, such as the 7.6-m telescope planned by the University of Texas, the cost of a traditional Hindle sphere (approximately 200 in. in diameter) is high enough to justify a search for a less expensive way to test the secondary. In connection with the present investigation, a number of options involving smaller spherical test mirrors have been examined. However, it was found that the use of such mirrors is not feasible. Other studies led to the design of a null test in which both spherical aberration and coma are zero. For a more general use of the considered test, attention is given to the variation in the conjugate positions as the conic constant changes for a secondary of 100-unit radius of curvature.
Baker Meinel Aden
Pettit Meinel Marjorie
No associations
LandOfFree
Self-null corrector test for telescope hyperbolic secondaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Self-null corrector test for telescope hyperbolic secondaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Self-null corrector test for telescope hyperbolic secondaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1305940