Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Jul 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995jgr...10012227e&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 100, no. A7, p. 12,227-12,233
Physics
Geophysics
5
Extreme Ultraviolet Radiation, Geophysics, Nitrogen, Oxygen Atoms, Remote Sensing, Solar Radiation, Sun, Thermosphere, Data Processing, Dayglow, Signal Analysis, Solar Flux
Scientific paper
The companion paper by Strickland et al. (this issue) describes a technique for deriving Q(sub EUV) and O/N2 from disk observations of O I 135.6-nm and N2 LBH dayglow emission. Q(sub EUV) refers to the integrated solar EUV energy flux below 45 nm and is derived from knowledge of the 135.6/LBH ratio or O/N2 in conjunction with either the 135.6 nm or LBH intensity. O/N2 refers to the ratio of the atomic oxygen (O) column density to the molecular nitrogen (N2) column density at a given value of the N2 column density. Strickland et al. show that the least uncertainty in derived values O/N2 occurs in the vicinity of an N2 depth of 10(exp 17) cm(exp -2). The O/N2 values presented in this paper are referenced to this depth. While Q(sub EUV) is obtained from the intensity of either 135.6 nm or LBH, O/N2 is obtained from the intensity ratio designated by 135.6/LBH. The technique has been used to derive O/N2 and Q(sub EUV) values from nadir-viewing far ultraviolet dayglow data obtained by the auroral and ionospheric remote sensor instrument on board the Polar BEAR satellite. Data are considered from single passes on July 15, 16, and 21, 1987, spanning a latitude range from 25 deg to 55 deg N. The 3-hour ap index was between 20 and 30 for the first two passes and only about 5 for the third pass. The 135.6-nm and LBH signals were obtained from spectra recorded at a resolution of 3.6 nm from which a background was subtracted followed by integration over the intervals from 134.5 to 139.0 nm and 155.0 to 170.0 nm. Uncertainties were assigned to the signals and their ratios that took into account statistical uncertainties in the true signal and in the subtracted background signal. Profiles of derived O/N2 with uncertainties reflecting the data uncertainties are shown along with mass spectrometer/incoherent scatter (MSIS) O/N2 profiles over 25-55 deg N. More structure is seen in the profiles on July 15 and 16, which are more disturbed days than July 21. In all cases, O/N2 increases from high to low latitudes. MSIS also shows such an increase but is much less structured. The results are shown to agree qualitatively with O/N2 values obtained from a general circulation model. Derived Q(sub EUV) values are in the range from 1.1 to 1.4 ergs/sq cm/s and are in good agreement with values derived from the Hinteregger spectrum for the F(sub 10.7) values appropriate to the observations. The results illustrate the potential of the technique for monitoring thermospheric dynamics through latitudinal and temporal variations in O/N2 which are signatures of ascending and descending motion in the thermosphere.
Evans Steven J.
Huffman Robert E.
Strickland Douglas J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Satellite remote sensing of thermospheric O/N2 and solar EUV. 2: Data analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Satellite remote sensing of thermospheric O/N2 and solar EUV. 2: Data analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Satellite remote sensing of thermospheric O/N2 and solar EUV. 2: Data analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1173451