Rupture directivity of the 2011, Mw 5.2 Lorca earthquake (Spain)

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

1

Seismology: Body Waves, Seismology: Earthquake Source Observations (1240), Tectonophysics: Dynamics And Mechanics Of Faulting (8004)

Scientific paper

On May 11th 2011, a rather small earthquake caused nine fatalities in the city of Lorca, SE-Spain. We analyze seismograms from a dense network to characterize the source of this earthquake. We estimate an oblique reverse faulting mechanism, moment magnitude of 5.2 and a shallow hypocenter (4.6 km), at only 5.5 km epicentral distance from the city center. Double difference relocations yield a ∼5 km long, NE-SW trending distribution of aftershocks SW of the mainshock, suggesting a SW propagating rupture along the Alhama de Murcia fault. We use the Mw 4.6 foreshock and an Mw 3.9 aftershock as empirical Greens functions to estimate apparent source time functions, observing a clear directivity effect. We model apparent durations with a unilateral and asymmetric bilateral rupture, in both cases obtaining rupture directivity of ∼N220°E, towards Lorca. In addition to the near epicenter and shallow depth, directivity may have contributed to the significant impact.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Rupture directivity of the 2011, Mw 5.2 Lorca earthquake (Spain) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Rupture directivity of the 2011, Mw 5.2 Lorca earthquake (Spain), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Rupture directivity of the 2011, Mw 5.2 Lorca earthquake (Spain) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1838770

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.