Physics – Optics
Scientific paper
Jul 1996
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996spie.2805...82c&link_type=abstract
Proc. SPIE Vol. 2805, p. 82-89, Multilayer and Grazing Incidence X-Ray/EUV Optics III, Richard B. Hoover; Arthur B. Walker; Eds.
Physics
Optics
Scientific paper
The effects of topographic finish errors on the quality of the image formed by a simple focusing mirror and the performance of different laboratory roughness-measuring instruments can be described in terms of a common formalism involving statistical operators or 'estimators'. In effect, conventional finish specifications and the test measurements used to ensure compliance with them, are stated in terms of the average values of these estimators. Int his paper we calculate correction factors to be applied to such average- based specifications and test measurements to account for the fluctuation effects inherent in the statistical nature of the processes considered.
Church Eugene L.
Takacs Peter Z.
No associations
LandOfFree
Role of sampling errors in the specification of x-ray mirror surfaces does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Role of sampling errors in the specification of x-ray mirror surfaces, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Role of sampling errors in the specification of x-ray mirror surfaces will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1384265