Revisiting the 'LSND anomaly' II: critique of the data analysis

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Experiment

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

30 pages, 16 figures, 6 tables

Scientific paper

This paper, together with a preceding paper, questions the so-called 'LSND anomaly': a 3.8 sigma excess of antielectronneutrino interactions over standard backgrounds, observed by the LSND Collaboration in a beam dump experiment with 800 MeV protons. That excess has been interpreted as evidence for the antimuonneutrino to antielectronneutrino oscillation in the \Deltam2 range from 0.2 eV2 to 2 eV2. Such a \Deltam2 range is incompatible with the widely accepted model of oscillations between three light neutrino species and would require the existence of at least one light 'sterile' neutrino. In a preceding paper, it was concluded that the estimates of standard backgrounds must be significantly increased. In this paper, the LSND Collaboration's estimate of the number of antielectronneutrino interactions followed by neutron capture, and of its error, is questioned. The overall conclusion is that the significance of the 'LSND anomaly' is not larger than 2.3 sigma.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Revisiting the 'LSND anomaly' II: critique of the data analysis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Revisiting the 'LSND anomaly' II: critique of the data analysis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Revisiting the 'LSND anomaly' II: critique of the data analysis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-394564

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.