Response to Note on “U Pb zircon age constraints on the Dongwanzi ultramafic mafic body, North China, confirm it is not an Archean ophiolite” by Kusky and Li

Details Response to Note on “U Pb zircon age constraints on the Dongwanzi ultramafic mafic body, North China, confirm it is not an Archean ophiolite” by Kusky and Li Response to Note on “U Pb zircon age constraints on the Dongwanzi ultramafic mafic body, North China, confirm it is not an Archean ophiolite” by Kusky and Li

Aug 2008

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2008e%26psl.273..231z&link_type=ejournal

Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 273, Issue 1-2, p. 231-234.

Physics

Scientific paper

Not Available

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Response to Note on “U Pb zircon age constraints on the Dongwanzi ultramafic mafic body, North China, confirm it is not an Archean ophiolite” by Kusky and Li does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Response to Note on “U Pb zircon age constraints on the Dongwanzi ultramafic mafic body, North China, confirm it is not an Archean ophiolite” by Kusky and Li, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Response to Note on “U Pb zircon age constraints on the Dongwanzi ultramafic mafic body, North China, confirm it is not an Archean ophiolite” by Kusky and Li will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1694577