Reply to Kinman concerning 3C 345

Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

3

Scientific paper

KINMAN1 claims (a) that the Yale photographic magnitudes of the quasar 3C 345 disagree systematically by 0.25 m with the Lick ~B magnitudes; (b) that the Yale magnitudes were affected systematically by the hour angle of the object at the time of observation; and (c) that because the reality of the ~0.4 m outburst of 3C 345 on the night of June 10-11, 1969, is based on a single observation, this result should be ``treated with considerable reserve''. The purpose of this report is to reply in turn to each of these criticisms.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reply to Kinman concerning 3C 345 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to Kinman concerning 3C 345, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Kinman concerning 3C 345 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1686761

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.