Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
1996-03-28
Phys.Rev.C54:1498-1499,1996
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
revtex file, 6 pages, submitted to Phys. Rev. C
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevC.54.1498
The Comment of Gazdzicki and Heinz is flawed because their assumed baryon stopping power in $pA$ is inconsistent with data and because they ignored half the analysis based on the VENUS model. The Comment continues the misleading presentation of strangeness enhancement by focusing on ratios of integrated yields. Those ratios discard essential experimental information on the rapidity dependence of produced $\Lambda$ and obscure discrepancies between different data sets. Our conclusion remains that the NA35 minimum bias data on $p+S\rightarrow\Lambda +X $ indicate an anomalous enhancement of central rapidity strangeness in few nucleon reactions that points to non-equilibrium dynamics as responsible for strangeness enhancement in nuclear reactions.
Gyulassy Miklos
Pop Vasile Topor
Wang and X. N.
No associations
LandOfFree
Reply to Comment of Gazdzicki and Heinz on Strangeness Enhancement in $p+A$ and $S+A$ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Reply to Comment of Gazdzicki and Heinz on Strangeness Enhancement in $p+A$ and $S+A$, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to Comment of Gazdzicki and Heinz on Strangeness Enhancement in $p+A$ and $S+A$ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-402770