Reference Frequencies in Astronomy and Related Sciences

Physics – Geophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6

Scientific paper

We explore the claim that citation rates for astronomers should not be compared with those of other scientists because astronomers put more references in their papers, causing their citation rates to be artificially high. We scanned 2079 papers with 59,659 references in 13 journals: five American astronomical journals, three non-American astronomical journals, and five journals in physics, chemistry, and geophysics. We find a tight relation between mean numbers of references, , and mean paper lengths,
, expressed in normalized 1000-word pages; it is 9.9 + 2.18
. Except for review papers and papers filled with many new data, this relation holds true within 2-3 σ for 12 of the journals. The reason why American papers in astronomy and geophysics have more references than papers in physics and chemistry is because the former are approximately twice as long; for papers of the same lenghts, the average numbers of references per paper are the same among all four sciences.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reference Frequencies in Astronomy and Related Sciences does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reference Frequencies in Astronomy and Related Sciences, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reference Frequencies in Astronomy and Related Sciences will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-905712

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.