Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

v3: Published version (minor rewordings, typos corrected, upper bounds in Table III improved/corrected); v2: 7 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052116

The class of d-setting, d-outcome Bell inequalities proposed by Ji and collaborators [Phys. Rev. A 78, 052103] are reexamined. For every positive integer d > 2, we show that the corresponding non-trivial Bell inequality for probabilities provides the maximum classical winning probability of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt-like game with d inputs and d outputs. We also demonstrate that the general classical upper bounds given by Ji et al. are underestimated, which invalidates many of the corresponding correlation inequalities presented thereof. We remedy this problem, partially, by providing the actual classical upper bound for d less than or equal to 13 (including non-prime values of d). We further determine that for prime value d in this range, most of these probability and correlation inequalities are tight, i.e., facet-inducing for the respective classical correlation polytope. Stronger lower and upper bounds on the quantum violation of these inequalities are obtained. In particular, we prove that once the probability inequalities are given, their correlation counterparts given by Ji and co-workers are no longer relevant in terms of detecting the entanglement of a quantum state.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reexamination of a multisetting Bell inequality for qudits will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-188351

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.