Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner: On alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

25 pages, LaTeX

Scientific paper

Many of the "counterintuitive" features of relativistic quantum field theory have their formal root in the Reeh-Schlieder theorem, which in particular entails that local operations applied to the vacuum state can produce any state of the entire field. It is of great interest, then, that I.E. Segal and, more recently, G. Fleming (in a paper entitled "Reeh-Schlieder Meets Newton-Wigner") have proposed an alternative "Newton-Wigner" localization scheme that avoids the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. In this paper, I reconstruct the Newton-Wigner localization scheme and clarify the limited extent to which it avoids the counterintuitive consequences of the Reeh-Schlieder theorem. I also argue that neither Segal nor Fleming has provided a coherent account of the physical meaning of Newton-Wigner localization.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner: On alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner: On alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reeh-Schlieder Defeats Newton-Wigner: On alternative localization schemes in relativistic quantum field theory will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-631251

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.