Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon?

Physics – Quantum Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10 pages, 0 figures, to appear in Foundations of Physics

Scientific paper

We reconsider the consequences of the observed violations of Bell's inequalities. Two common responses to these violations are: (i) the rejection of realism and the retention of locality, and (ii) the rejection of locality and the retention of realism. Here we critique response (i). We argue that locality contains an implicit form of realism, since in a world view that embraces locality, spacetime, with its usual, fixed topology, has properties independent of measurement. Hence we argue that response (i) is incomplete, in that its rejection of realism is only partial.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Realism or Locality: Which Should We Abandon? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-83480

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.