Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Jul 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004eostr..85..258g&link_type=abstract
EOS Transactions, AGU, Volume 85, Issue 27, p. 258-258
Physics
Geophysics
Forum, Exploration Geophysics: Instruments And Techniques, Exploration Geophysics: Radioactivity Methods, Geochemistry: Instruments And Techniques
Scientific paper
Regarding the article by Provost et al. (Eos, 23 March 2004; pp. 113, 119), I have some comments concerning the interpretation of radon data and the instrumentation used for this purpose. In the first instance, it is obvious that the site presents a great number of advantages for studying the fluid transport phenomena in porous media, and I encourage the authors to continue in this investigation. My first observation is concerning the radon data shown in the paper. The authors show the data obtained in one station, using a Barasol® probe to measure radon in the air. The Barasol® probe was created initially to measure radon concentrations in the soil, and its precision is not the same as a prove like an AlphaGUARD®, for example. Moreover, the authors are aware of this limitation. It will be interesting to compare this data with that obtained with the AlphaGUARD®, or in the instrumented chamber described in the article that is 55 m from the tunnel entrance, named the Inner Room by the authors.
No associations
LandOfFree
Radon Data from the Roselend Experiment in the French Alps does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Radon Data from the Roselend Experiment in the French Alps, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Radon Data from the Roselend Experiment in the French Alps will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1009437