Physics
Scientific paper
Nov 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011geoji.187..797v&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Journal International, Volume 187, Issue 2, pp. 797-812.
Physics
Satellite Geodesy, Time Variable Gravity, Dynamics Of Lithosphere And Mantle, Rheology: Mantle
Scientific paper
In areas dominated by Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA), the free-air gravity anomaly rate can be converted to uplift rate to good approximation by using a simple spectral relation. We provide quantitative comparisons between gravity rates derived from monthly gravity field solutions (GFZ Potsdam, CSR Texas, IGG Bonn) from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite mission with uplift rates measured by GPS in these areas. The band-limited gravity data from the GRACE satellite mission can be brought to very good agreement with the point data from GPS by using scaling factors derived from a GIA model (the root-mean-square of differences is 0.55 mm yr-1 for a maximum uplift rate signal of 10 mm yr-1). The root-mean-square of the differences between GRACE derived uplift rates and GPS derived uplift rates decreases with increasing GRACE time period to a level below the uncertainty that is expected from GRACE observations, GPS measurements and the conversion from gravity rate to uplift rate. With the current length of time-series (more than 8 yr) applying filters and a hydrology correction to the GRACE data does not reduce the root-mean-square of differences significantly. The smallest root-mean-square was obtained with the GFZ solution in Fennoscandia and with the CSR solution in North America. With radial gravity rates in excellent agreement with GPS uplift rates, more information on the GIA process can be extracted from GRACE gravity field solutions in the form of tangential gravity rates, which are equivalent to a rate of change in the deflection of the vertical scaled by the magnitude of gravity rate vector. Tangential gravity rates derived from GRACE point towards the centre of the previously glaciated area, and are largest in a location close to the centre of the former ice sheet. Forward modelling showed that present day tangential gravity rates have maximum sensitivity between the centre and edge of the former ice sheet, while radial gravity rates are most sensitive in the centre of the former ice sheet. As a result, tangential gravity rates offer constraints on a two-layer mantle viscosity profile that are different from radial gravity rates, which can be exploited in future GIA studies.
Kurtenbach Enrico
Kusche Jürgen
van der Wal Wouter
Vermeersen Bert
No associations
LandOfFree
Radial and tangential gravity rates from GRACE in areas of glacial isostatic adjustment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Radial and tangential gravity rates from GRACE in areas of glacial isostatic adjustment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Radial and tangential gravity rates from GRACE in areas of glacial isostatic adjustment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-738801