Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Dec 1993
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993aas...183.6707v&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, 183rd AAS Meeting, #67.07; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 25, p.1395
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
All observed characteristics of quasars are customarily interpreted using the standard Big Bang model and the assumption that their redshifts are primarily due to the expansion of the universe. These same characteristics can also be interpreted using alternative models in which quasar redshifts are not cosmological. The quality of these two interpretations is compared. It is concluded that Occam's Razor cuts sharply in favor of the nearby quasar interpretation. The most recent data, suggesting quasar proper motions, apparent brightnesses not diminishing with increasing redshift, and superluminal jet motions without relativistic beaming, are especially telling against the standard model.
No associations
LandOfFree
Quasars: Near versus Far does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Quasars: Near versus Far, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quasars: Near versus Far will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-779721