Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2003-10-20
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
to be published in the Proceedings of "AGN Physics with the SDSS"
Scientific paper
Recent claims by Ivezic et al. (2002) that the distribution of the radio-to-optical flux ratio, R, for quasars is bimodal (the so-called quasar radio dichotomy) were questioned on statistical grounds by Cirasuolo et al. (2003). We apply the approach suggested by Cirasuolo et al. to a sample of \~10,000 objects detected by SDSS and FIRST, and find support for the quasar radio dichotomy. The discrepancy between the claims by Cirasuolo et al. and the results presented here is most likely because 1) the ~100 times larger sample based on two homogeneous surveys that is used here allows a direct determination of the R distribution, rather than relying on indirect inferences based on Monte Carlo simulations of several heterogeneous surveys 2) the accurate SDSS colors and redshift information allow robust determination of the K-correction for R, which, if unaccounted for, introduces significant scatter that masks the intrinsic properties of the quasar R distribution.
Gunn James E.
Hall Patrick B.
Ivezic Zeljko
Jagoda A. S.
Knapp Gillan R.
No associations
LandOfFree
Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quasar Radio Dichotomy: Two Peaks, or not Two Peaks, that is the Question will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-420753