Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study

Details Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study

2009-11-16

arxiv.org/abs/0911.3085v1

Physics

Physics and Society

Scientific paper

Competitive allocation of research funding is a major mechanism within the science system. It is fundamentally based on the idea of peer review. Peer review is central in project selection as peers are considered to be in a unique position to identify and select the best and most innovative researchers and research projects. In this study, we assess the practice of peer-review based project selection. The basic question is "do the best researchers get the funding"? In other words, do peer review based quality indicators predict success in receiving funding? The next question to be answered is about the peer review. Do peer reviewers indeed recognize the best researchers, and subsequently, is the decision of the research council based on the outcomes of peer review? Finally, we answer the question whether other factors influence the probability of receiving funding, such as the role of co-applicants, the effects of gender, and the effect of the discipline of the application.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Past Performance as Predictor of Successful Grant Applications: A Case Study will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-499496