Physics – Nuclear Physics – Nuclear Theory
Scientific paper
2008-01-29
J.Phys.G35:125003,2008
Physics
Nuclear Physics
Nuclear Theory
12 pages, 5 figures. version to appear in J. Phys. G.: Nucl. Part. Phys
Scientific paper
10.1088/0954-3899/35/12/125003
We point out that there exist two natural definitions of the nucleon magnetization densities : the density $\rho_M^K (r)$ introduced in Kelly's phenomenological analysis and theoretically more standard one $\rho_M (r)$. We can derive an explicit analytical relation between them, although Kelly's density is more useful to disentangle the physical origin of the different $Q^2$ dependence of the Sachs electric and magnetic form factors of the nucleon. We evaluate both of $\rho_M (r)$ and $\rho_M^K (r)$ as well as the charge density $\rho_{ch}(r)$ of the proton within the framework of the chiral quark soliton model, to find a noticeable qualitative difference between $\rho_{ch}(r)$ and $\rho_M^K (r)$, which is just consistent with Kelly's result obtained from the empirical information on the Sachs electric and magnetic form factors of the proton.
Nakakoji Y.
Wakamatsu Masashi
No associations
LandOfFree
On the physics behind the form factor ratio $μ_p G_E^p (Q^2) / G_M^p (Q^2)$ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the physics behind the form factor ratio $μ_p G_E^p (Q^2) / G_M^p (Q^2)$, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the physics behind the form factor ratio $μ_p G_E^p (Q^2) / G_M^p (Q^2)$ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-185315