Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
Dec 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010agufm.p32a..06b&link_type=abstract
American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2010, abstract #P32A-06
Physics
Geophysics
[5475] Planetary Sciences: Solid Surface Planets / Tectonics
Scientific paper
The relatively recent discovery of larger-than-Earth extra-solar terrestrial planets has opened up many possibilities for different modes of interior dynamics, including mantle convection. A great deal of basic mineral physics is still needed to understand the state of matter and rheology of these super terrestrials, even assuming similar compositions to Earth (which is itself unlikely given the effect of singular events such as giant impacts and lunar formation). There has been speculation and debate as to whether the larger Rayleigh numbers of super-Earth's would promote plate tectonic style recycling, which is considered a crucial negative feedback for buffering atmospheric CO2 and stabilizing climate through weathering and mineral carbonation. However, models of plate generation through grainsize-reducing damage (see Foley & Bercovici this session) show that the effect of larger Rayleigh numbers is offset by an increase in the lithosphere-mantle viscosity contrast (due to a hotter mantle). Super-Earth's are therefore probably no more (or less) prone to plate tectonics than "normal" Earths; other conditions like surface temperature (and thus orbital position) are more important than size for facilitating plate tectonic cycling, which is of course more in keeping with observations in our own solar system (i.e., the disparity between Earth and Venus). Regardless, two major questions remain. First, what are the other modes of convective recycling that would possibly buffer CO2 and allow for a negative feedback that stabilizes climate? For example, subarial basaltic volcanism associated with plume or diapiric convection could potentially draw down CO2 because of the reactibility of mafic minerals; this mechanism possibly helped trigger Snow Ball events in the Proterozoic Earth during break-up of near-equatorial super-continents. Second, what observations of exo-planets provide tests for theories of tectonics or convective cycling? Spectroscopic techniques are most likely to reveal information about atmospheric composition, which ostensibly has the the signature of plate tectonics. As noted by Valencia et al., signs of CO2 or SO2 cycling and buffering could be interpretted as indicators of tectonic activity. The presence of aerosols (e.g., sulfates) would also imply active volcanism, although on Earth they are stabilized in the stratosphere, which itself depends on the existence of free oxygen. In the end, major questions remain concerning possible modes of mantle dynamics and overturn that are crucial for understanding planetary and atmospheric evolution, but which will require broad integration of astronomy, geophysics and atmoshperic sciences.
No associations
LandOfFree
On the Modes of Mantle Convection in Super-Earths (Invited) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the Modes of Mantle Convection in Super-Earths (Invited), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the Modes of Mantle Convection in Super-Earths (Invited) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1496692