Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
Scientific paper
2005-12-11
Prog.Theor.Phys.115:601-609,2006
Physics
High Energy Physics
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
10 pages, 3 figures, uses ptptex.sty
Scientific paper
10.1143/PTP.115.601
Based on the previous approach, we have investigated a possibility to resolve the discrepancy between the E710, E811 and CDF at sqrt s =1.8TeV, using the experimental data of the pp, pbar p total cross sections sigma tot(+) and rho(+)$ ratio up to the SPS experiments (sqrt s = 0.9TeV) as inputs. We predict sigma tot(pbar p) and rho(pbar p) at the Tevatron energy(sqrt s=1.8TeV) as sigma tot(pbar p)=75.9+- 1.0mb, rho(pbar p)=0.136+- 0.005. It turns out that only the data of E710 is consistent with the prediction in the one standard deviation. So we can conclude that E710 is preferable but we can exclude neither CDF nor E811 results.
Igi Keiji
Ishida Muneyuki
No associations
LandOfFree
On the Discrepancy of pp, pbar p Total Cross Sections at sqrt s = 1.8TeV does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the Discrepancy of pp, pbar p Total Cross Sections at sqrt s = 1.8TeV, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the Discrepancy of pp, pbar p Total Cross Sections at sqrt s = 1.8TeV will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-502591