Physics
Scientific paper
Sep 1985
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1985jgr....90.9312l&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 90, Sept. 30, 1985, p. 9312-9334.
Physics
37
Earth Gravitation, Geopotential, Gravity Anomalies, Orbit Perturbation, Altimeters, Error Analysis, Geoids, Spherical Harmonics
Scientific paper
The Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) has occupied a central position within NASA with respect to the development of earth gravity models. The gravity models at Goddard, which are referred to as the Goddard earth models (GEM's) have been under development for more than 15 years. The fields have increased in size and (apparent) accuracy with the inclusion of new tracking data, better nongravitational force modeling, and more orbits over a wide range of inclinations and mean motions. The usefulness of the considered models depends largely on accuracy estimates. The present paper is concerned with a reevaluation of earlier accuracy assessments, taking into account the accuracies of the GEM 9 and the GEM-L2 models. It is found that GEM 9 is about 30 percent more accurate than originally estimated in 1979 from older gravimetry data.
Klosko Steve M.
Lerch F. J.
Patel G. B.
Wagner Carl A.
No associations
LandOfFree
On the accuracy of recent Goddard gravity models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with On the accuracy of recent Goddard gravity models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On the accuracy of recent Goddard gravity models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-801683