On Kinds of Indiscernibility in Logic and Metaphysics

Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

55 pages, 21 figures. Forthcoming, after an Appendectomy, in the British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

Scientific paper

Using the Hilbert-Bernays account as a spring-board, we first define four ways in which two objects can be discerned from one another, using the non-logical vocabulary of the language concerned. (These definitions are based on definitions made by Quine and Saunders.) Because of our use of the Hilbert-Bernays account, these definitions are in terms of the syntax of the language. But we also relate our definitions to the idea of permutations on the domain of quantification, and their being symmetries. These relations turn out to be subtle---some natural conjectures about them are false. We will see in particular that the idea of symmetry meshes with a species of indiscernibility that we will call `absolute indiscernibility'. We then report all the logical implications between our four kinds of discernibility. We use these four kinds as a resource for stating four metaphysical theses about identity. Three of these theses articulate two traditional philosophical themes: viz. the principle of the identity of indiscernibles (which will come in two versions), and haecceitism. The fourth is recent. Its most notable feature is that it makes diversity (i.e. non-identity) weaker than what we will call individuality (being an individual): two objects can be distinct but not individuals. For this reason, it has been advocated both for quantum particles and for spacetime points. Finally, we locate this fourth metaphysical thesis in a broader position, which we call structuralism. We conclude with a discussion of the semantics suitable for a structuralist, with particular reference to physical theories as well as elementary model theory.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

On Kinds of Indiscernibility in Logic and Metaphysics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with On Kinds of Indiscernibility in Logic and Metaphysics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and On Kinds of Indiscernibility in Logic and Metaphysics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-254998

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.