Physics – Geophysics
Scientific paper
2008-08-26
Physics
Geophysics
23 pages, 7 figures. Typographical error corrected in accelerated algorithms (14) and (20)
Scientific paper
10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.020
The effects of several nonlinear regularization techniques are discussed in the framework of 3D seismic tomography. Traditional, linear, $\ell_2$ penalties are compared to so-called sparsity promoting $\ell_1$ and $\ell_0$ penalties, and a total variation penalty. Which of these algorithms is judged optimal depends on the specific requirements of the scientific experiment. If the correct reproduction of model amplitudes is important, classical damping towards a smooth model using an $\ell_2$ norm works almost as well as minimizing the total variation but is much more efficient. If gradients (edges of anomalies) should be resolved with a minimum of distortion, we prefer $\ell_1$ damping of Daubechies-4 wavelet coefficients. It has the additional advantage of yielding a noiseless reconstruction, contrary to simple $\ell_2$ minimization (`Tikhonov regularization') which should be avoided. In some of our examples, the $\ell_0$ method produced notable artifacts. In addition we show how nonlinear $\ell_1$ methods for finding sparse models can be competitive in speed with the widely used $\ell_2$ methods, certainly under noisy conditions, so that there is no need to shun $\ell_1$ penalizations.
Daubechies Ingrid
Douma Huub
Loris Ignace
Nolet Guust
Regone C.
No associations
LandOfFree
Nonlinear regularization techniques for seismic tomography does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Nonlinear regularization techniques for seismic tomography, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Nonlinear regularization techniques for seismic tomography will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-281362