Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency

Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

We investigate the structure common to causal theories that attempt to explain a (part of) the world. Causality implies conservation of identity, itself a far from simple notion. It imposes strong demands on the universalizing power of the theories concerned. These demands are often met by the introduction of a metalevel which encompasses the notions of 'system' and 'lawful behaviour'. In classical mechanics, the division between universal and particular leaves its traces in the separate treatment of cinematics and dynamics. This analysis is applied to the mechanical theories of Newton and Leibniz, with some surprising results.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-14333

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.