Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics
Scientific paper
2012-03-10
Physics
History and Philosophy of Physics
Scientific paper
We investigate the structure common to causal theories that attempt to explain a (part of) the world. Causality implies conservation of identity, itself a far from simple notion. It imposes strong demands on the universalizing power of the theories concerned. These demands are often met by the introduction of a metalevel which encompasses the notions of 'system' and 'lawful behaviour'. In classical mechanics, the division between universal and particular leaves its traces in the separate treatment of cinematics and dynamics. This analysis is applied to the mechanical theories of Newton and Leibniz, with some surprising results.
No associations
LandOfFree
Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Newton vs. Leibniz: Intransparency vs. Inconsistency will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-14333