Physics – History and Philosophy of Physics
Scientific paper
2012-02-16
Physics
History and Philosophy of Physics
12 pages, accepted for publication in International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
Scientific paper
10.1007/s11153-012-9337-6
We present a formal analysis of the Cosmological Argument in its two main forms: that due to Aquinas, and the revised version of the Kalam Cosmological Argument more recently advocated by William Lane Craig. We formulate these two arguments in such a way that each conclusion follows in first-order logic from the corresponding assumptions. Our analysis shows that the conclusion which follows for Aquinas is considerably weaker than what his aims demand. With formalizations that are logically valid in hand, we reinterpret the natural language versions of the premises and conclusions in terms of concepts of causality consistent with (and used in) recent work in cosmology done by physicists. In brief: the Kalam argument commits the fallacy of equivocation in a way that seems beyond repair; two of the premises adopted by Aquinas seem dubious when the terms `cause' and `causality' are interpreted in the context of contemporary empirical science. Thus, while there are no problems with whether the conclusions follow logically from their assumptions, the Kalam argument is not viable, and the Aquinas argument does not imply a caused origination of the universe. The assumptions of the latter are at best less than obvious relative to recent work in the sciences. We conclude with mention of a new argument that makes some positive modifications to an alternative variation on Aquinas by Le Poidevin, which nonetheless seems rather weak.
Pérez Daniela
Romero Gustavo E.
No associations
LandOfFree
New remarks on the Cosmological Argument does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with New remarks on the Cosmological Argument, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and New remarks on the Cosmological Argument will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-125845