Physics
Scientific paper
Apr 2004
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004eostr..85..160a&link_type=abstract
EOS Transactions, AGU, Volume 85, Issue 16, p. 160-160
Physics
1
Forum, Public Issues: Science Policy, Public Issues: General Or Miscellaneous
Scientific paper
Reading the ongoing correspondence in Eos, I would propose that the difficulty lies in the dual nature of the reviewing process. The first stage asks, is the work worth publishing? The second asks, is the paper as submitted worthy of the work done? The dilemma is that the requirements for anonymity are different for the two functions. Like most of the correspondents in Eos, I feel that the evaluation of the merit of the work must remain anonymous. Personally, I prefer it to be ``double blind,'' in which the author of the paper is not revealed, although it is often not hard to guess. That way I can give the material the fairest possible treatment.
No associations
LandOfFree
More on Anonymous Reviews does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with More on Anonymous Reviews, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and More on Anonymous Reviews will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-733566