Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline

Physics – Physics and Society

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

25 pages in 1 Column Preprint format, 7 Figures, 4 Tables. Version II: changes made in response to referee comments. Note: cha

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevE.81.036114

Publication statistics are ubiquitous in the ratings of scientific achievement, with citation counts and paper tallies factoring into an individual's consideration for postdoctoral positions, junior faculty, tenure, and even visa status for international scientists. Citation statistics are designed to quantify individual career achievement, both at the level of a single publication, and over an individual's entire career. While some academic careers are defined by a few significant papers (possibly out of many), other academic careers are defined by the cumulative contribution made by the author's publications to the body of science. Several metrics have been formulated to quantify an individual's publication career, yet none of these metrics account for the dependence of citation counts and journal size on time. In this paper, we normalize publication metrics across both time and discipline in order to achieve a universal framework for analyzing and comparing scientific achievement. We study the publication careers of individual authors over the 50-year period 1958-2008 within six high-impact journals: CELL, the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Nature, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS), Physical Review Letters (PRL), and Science. In comparing the achievement of authors within each journal, we uncover quantifiable statistical regularity in the probability density function (pdf) of scientific achievement across both time and discipline. The universal distribution of career success within these arenas for publication raises the possibility that a fundamental driving force underlying scientific achievement is the competitive nature of scientific advancement.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-391835

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.