Meaningful characterisation of perturbative theoretical uncertainties

Physics – High Energy Physics – High Energy Physics - Phenomenology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

28 pages, 5 figures. Language modified in order to make it more 'bayesian'. No change in results. Version published in JHEP

Scientific paper

10.1007/JHEP09(2011)039

We consider the problem of assigning a meaningful degree of belief to uncertainty estimates of perturbative series. We analyse the assumptions which are implicit in the conventional estimates made using renormalisation scale variations. We then formulate a Bayesian model that, given equivalent initial hypotheses, allows one to characterise a perturbative theoretical uncertainty in a rigorous way in terms of a credibility interval for the remainder of the series. We compare its outcome to the conventional uncertainty estimates in the simple case of the calculation of QCD corrections to the e+e- -> hadrons process. We find comparable results, but with important conceptual differences. This work represents a first step in the direction of a more comprehensive and rigorous handling of theoretical uncertainties in perturbative calculations used in high energy phenomenology.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Meaningful characterisation of perturbative theoretical uncertainties does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Meaningful characterisation of perturbative theoretical uncertainties, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Meaningful characterisation of perturbative theoretical uncertainties will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-216849

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.